I've checked in this patch to fix a couple more typos in the extended
asm documentation, as noted by David.
-Sandra
2015-02-10 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/extend.texi (Extended Asm): Fix typos.
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 220598)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@ -7063,7 +7063,7 @@ within the same @code{asm} statement can
When not using an @var{asmSymbolicName}, use the (zero-based) position
of the operand
in the list of operands in the assembler template. For example if there are
-two output opeerands and three inputs,
+two output operands and three inputs,
use @samp{%2} in the template to refer to the first input operand,
@samp{%3} for the second, and @samp{%4} for the third.
@@ -7099,7 +7099,7 @@ consecutive colons where the output oper
@example
__asm__ ("some instructions"
: /* No outputs. */
- : "r" (Offset / 8);
+ : "r" (Offset / 8));
@end example
@strong{Warning:} Do @emph{not} modify the contents of input-only operands
