> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:04 PM > > Given the rs6000 is affected, one could do before/after tests natively > in the gcc farm to ensure that removing that code doesn't change the > generated code across a bootstrap.
Wouldn't that only tell whether the macro can stay undefined for rs6000? MD files for rs6000 could have been tighten since then but not others backend's MD files. > > That's probably how I'd approach gathering some data about whether or > not the comment/code is still appropriate/needed. Do people with svn access automatically have access to the GCC farm or does one needs to request such access? Best regards, Thomas
