On 02/25/2015 11:28 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Am I on the right track with my assumption that it is correct that nvptx.c:nvptx_option_override is not invoked in the offloading code path, so we'd need a new target hook (?) to consolidate/override the options in this scenario?
I'm surprised by this. Does lto1 not go through do_compile? I guess that's plausible, but I think in that case we should invoke this hook if ACCEL_COMPILER.
Bernd