Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Backporting of the fix went into GCC 5 seems to intrusive for the
> released branches.  Hence I'd propose to remove the problematic patterns
> altogether, as they can silently generate wrong code.  The attached
> patch does that.  Tested briefly with 'make all' and with
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp --target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
> 
> Kaz, do you have any objections?

I have no objection.

Regards,
        kaz

Reply via email to