On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:04:57PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> Not really (I don't like -fdump-passes ...), but we need to make sure >> that -fdump-passes doesn't crash (because it runs very early and >> with cfun == NULL I think) > > If it runs with cfun == NULL, then supposedly the gates that are dependent > on current function should for -fdump-passes purposes also return true > if cfun == NULL (well, of course do all the unconditional checks). > Though of course, with optimize/target attributes this is harder, as > different functions can use different options.
Yes, one reason why I think -fdump-passes is just broken implementation-wise. Richard. > Jakub
