On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > Sure, I can update that, I'll retest and repost.
Yes, please. Probably the tree-parloops.h include will not be needed either then. > Indeed, it's not done here, but it is still done, only later. > > The function we create in parloops is split off using omp_expand, and that's > where we mark the function as parallelized, just like other omp functions, > in expand_omp_taskreg. Ah, you're right. Jakub