On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > Sure, I can update that, I'll retest and repost.
Yes, please. Probably the tree-parloops.h include will not be needed either
then.
> Indeed, it's not done here, but it is still done, only later.
>
> The function we create in parloops is split off using omp_expand, and that's
> where we mark the function as parallelized, just like other omp functions,
> in expand_omp_taskreg.
Ah, you're right.
Jakub
