Hi Sandra, On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
OK, here is a patch that attempts to implement that convention. I'd appreciate review from a target maintainer to check that I've correctly disambiguated places where "i386" was referring to both 32- and 64-bit variants vs 32-bit only. I've left alone some instances of "i386" where it seemed appropriate to name a specific processor -- e.g. there are a bunch of examples in the inline asm section that are described as "i386 code".
mind adding this to https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html where we have a table for spelling (even though this is more "spelling")? That way we have a reference point in the future. Thanks, Gerald
