On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> Hi Terry,
>
> I went ahead and committed some small changes to the description of
> -masm-syntax-unified.  Let me know if you disagree or would like to
> see further changes.
>
> Gerald
>

Thanks for the improvement. I am totally ok with them.

BR,
Terry

> Index: changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.101
> diff -u -r1.101 changes.html
> --- changes.html        9 Apr 2015 23:30:47 -0000       1.101
> +++ changes.html        10 Apr 2015 21:47:01 -0000
> @@ -636,8 +636,8 @@
>
>  <h3 id="arm">ARM</h3>
>       <ul>
> -      <li> The Thumb-1 assembly code is now generated in unified syntax. The 
> new option
> -        <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> can be used to specify whether 
> inline assembly
> +      <li>Thumb-1 assembly code is now generated in unified syntax. The new 
> option
> +        <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> specifies whether inline assembly
>          code is using unified syntax. By default the option is off which 
> means
>          non-unified syntax is used. However this is subject to change in 
> future releases.
>          Eventually the non-unified syntax will be deprecated.

Reply via email to