On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: Thanks for the nice summary in the first part of the mail. Two typos:
> + /* Most of the time tree_swap_operands_p does what we want. But there's
Shouldn't that be "there are"?
> + cases where we we know one operand is better for copy propagation than
Redundant "we".
Marek
