On 29 April 2015 at 17:04, Doug Evans wrote: > Tested the same patch on the gcc 5.0 branch. > Just double checking ... ok to apply there too?
Yes, OK for the branch too. > btw, the test is currently marked as unsupported by the test run. > I don't know what would be involved in marking it as failing instead, > but I noticed this happening a lot while I was working with this code. > I can imagine more failures going unnoticed because of this. That's due to: (*): Shared library is missing debugging information.^M skipping: (*): Shared library is missing debugging information.^M list.gdb:10: Error in sourced command file:^M Cannot evaluate function -- may be inlined^M skipping: list.gdb:10: Error in sourced command file:^M skipping: Cannot evaluate function -- may be inlined^M UNSUPPORTED: libstdc++-xmethods/list.cc But I can't say anything more useful than that.