> The generated code. genrecog.c itself isn't bad. :-) Nice work then.
> OK. I'd left the head comment alone because it just described the > interface, which hasn't changed. But I suppose past lack of commentary > doesn't justify future lack of commentary. Here's what I added: > [...] > BTW, hope at least part of the doubling in size is due to more commentary > in the code itself. I see. Thanks a lot for writing down the description of the algorithm! > I'd rather leave stuff like that to someone who wants it rather than try > to write routines speculatively in the hope that someone would find them > useful. OK. -- Eric Botcazou
