Two easy DRs to implement. We even had the tests half written.
Tested x86_64-linux and powerpc64l2-linux, committed to trunk. I'll probably backport this in a week or two.
commit c1a6989fbdad9870cdd2240d5fda58054d0ba5ae Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> Date: Sat May 2 11:29:17 2015 +0100 PR libstdc++/65978 * include/std/tuple (forward_as_tuple, tie): Add constexpr. * testsuite/20_util/tuple/creation_functions/constexpr.cc: Uncomment and fix tests for forward_as_tuple and tie. diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple index e500a76..ad132bd 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple @@ -970,8 +970,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION return __result_type(std::forward<_Elements>(__args)...); } + // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS + // 2275. Why is forward_as_tuple not constexpr? template<typename... _Elements> - tuple<_Elements&&...> + constexpr tuple<_Elements&&...> forward_as_tuple(_Elements&&... __args) noexcept { return tuple<_Elements&&...>(std::forward<_Elements>(__args)...); } @@ -1120,9 +1122,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION return __concater::_S_do(std::forward<_Tpls>(__tpls)...); } + // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS + // 2301. Why is tie not constexpr? /// tie template<typename... _Elements> - inline tuple<_Elements&...> + constexpr tuple<_Elements&...> tie(_Elements&... __args) noexcept { return tuple<_Elements&...>(__args...); } diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/creation_functions/constexpr.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/creation_functions/constexpr.cc index 2c47fbb..3ededfc 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/creation_functions/constexpr.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/creation_functions/constexpr.cc @@ -45,49 +45,51 @@ test_make_tuple() } } -#if 0 // forward_as_tuple void test_forward_as_tuple() { { - typedef std::tuple<int, float> tuple_type; + static int i(22); + static float f(22.222); + typedef std::tuple<int&, float&&> tuple_type; constexpr tuple_type p1 __attribute__((unused)) - = std::forward_as_tuple(22, 22.222); + = std::forward_as_tuple(i, std::move(f)); } { - typedef std::tuple<int, float, int> tuple_type; + static int i(22); + static float f(22.222); + static int ii(77799); + + typedef std::tuple<int&, float&, int&&> tuple_type; constexpr tuple_type p1 __attribute__((unused)) - = std::forward_as_tuple(22, 22.222, 77799); + = std::forward_as_tuple(i, f, std::move(ii)); } } -#endif -#if 0 // tie void test_tie() { { - int i(22); - float f(22.222); - typedef std::tuple<int, float> tuple_type; + static int i(22); + static float f(22.222); + typedef std::tuple<int&, float&> tuple_type; constexpr tuple_type p1 __attribute__((unused)) = std::tie(i, f); } { - int i(22); - float f(22.222); - int ii(77799); + static int i(22); + static float f(22.222); + static const int ii(77799); - typedef std::tuple<int, float, int> tuple_type; + typedef std::tuple<int&, float&, const int&> tuple_type; constexpr tuple_type p1 __attribute__((unused)) = std::tie(i, f, ii); } } -#endif // get void @@ -124,6 +126,8 @@ int main() { test_make_tuple(); + test_forward_as_tuple(); + test_tie(); test_get(); test_tuple_cat();