> I can change the error to something like > > "Intrinsic function NULL() cannot be an actual argument to > STORAGE_SIZE because it returns a disassociated pointer”
I think that’d be better, indeed. > No. This isn't a numbered constraint. I spent an hour or so > tracing though parent namespaces and symbol trees to see if > I could catch the problem in comment #2. I think that this > would require a runtime error (or adding an internal attribute > that explicitly tracks associate/disassociation and > allocation/deallocation). That seems likely. Thus: OK to commit with adjusted error message (and testcase pattern). FX
