On 05/16/2015 10:45 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
--- snip ---

> Thanks Steve,
> 
> Committed revision 223248.
> 
> 

I had some time to play with this a little more this afternoon.

I am going to commit the following little patchlet that gives us the nice
warning we should have. (After full regression testing of course)

gfc -Wall continuation_13.f90
continuation_13.f90:22:4: Warning: Missing ‘&’ in continued character constant
at (1) [-Wampersand]
continuation_13.f90:24:4: Warning: Missing ‘&’ in continued character constant
at (1) [-Wampersand]


Index: scanner.c
===================================================================
--- scanner.c   (revision 223250)
+++ scanner.c   (working copy)
@@ -1383,7 +1383,12 @@
                             "constant at %C");
            }
          else if (!in_string && (c == '\'' || c == '"'))
+           {
+             gfc_warning (OPT_Wampersand,
+                            "Missing %<&%> in continued character "
+                            "constant at %C");
              goto done;
+           }
          /* Both !$omp and !$ -fopenmp continuation lines have & on the
             continuation line only optionally.  */
          else if (openmp_flag || openacc_flag || openmp_cond_flag)



Reply via email to