On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:33:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > Would that be a good idea ? For symmetry, I thought > > (for op (list) > > op2 (op)) > > should be supported too. > > Hmm, but is this really a useful extension? To me it just complicates > the syntax for the occasional reader.
FWIW, I'd prefer this to be rejected than supported.
Marek
