On 05/19/2015 01:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I tracked down that those are implicit typedef created by
create_implicit_typedef.
My patch made them no longer anonymous that in turn triggers the bogus
diagnostics.
I do not think it is fully correct though - those types are not anonymous.
Hmm? The types are anonymous:
static struct
{
int moves_inserted;
int copies_inserted;
int insns_deleted;
} stats;
Here there is a variable named 'stats', but its type has no name.
(I also wonder we we need to introdce a type name "._134") and pass it all the
way down
to LTO.
Anonymous types do need to have some name, so that we can mangle them.
But I don't know if they need to remain past free_lang_data.
Jason
