On 21.05.15 20:14, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 20.05.15 22:30, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/20/2015 11:04 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hi,

the attached patch enables some PIE tests on FreeBSD.

Ok for trunk?

Thanks,
Andreas

2015-05-20  Andreas Tobler  <andre...@gcc.gnu.org>

       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Enable test on FreeBSD.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c: Likewise
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr39013-1.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr39013-2.c: Likewise.
       * gcc.target/i386/pr64317.c: Likewise.
Wouldn't it be better to remove the target selector and instead add:

/* { dg-require-effective-target pie } */

In each of those tests?

While the net effect is the same today, it means there's only one place
to change if another x86 target gains PIE support in the future.

Pre-approved using that style.

Thanks!

Tested on amd64-freebsd and CentOS.

Andreas


This is what I committed:

2015-05-21  Andreas Tobler  <andre...@gcc.gnu.org>

        * gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Use 'dg-require-effective-target pie'
        instead of listing several targets on its own.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr64317.c: Likewise.

Yes, I know. The comment and the content for this test case do not match.

Is this ok:

Index: gcc.target/i386/pr64317.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.target/i386/pr64317.c   (revision 223498)
+++ gcc.target/i386/pr64317.c   (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { *-*-freebsd* *-*-linux* } && ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target pie } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fpie" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "addl\[ \\t\]+\[$\]_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %ebx" } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "movl\[ \\t\]+c@GOTOFF\[(\]%ebx\[)\]" } } */


or do you prefer instead of

/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */

this one:

/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target ia32 } */


Btw, all three variants run on i386.

Thanks,
Andreas

Reply via email to