Hi Mikael, Yes, that's fine for 5 and 6.
Thanks for the patch. Paul On 23 May 2015 at 23:35, Mikael Morin <mikael.mo...@sfr.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > For PR 63727, a check was introduced, rejecting procedure pointer > components used as actual arguments: > foo(obj%proc_comp) > but it had the side effect of also rejecting > foo(obj%proc_comp(arg)) > > Fixed by the attached patch. > Tested on x86_64-linux. OK for 6/5 ? > > Mikael > > > -- Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx
