Ping!
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Kumar, Venkataramanan
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:07 PM
To: James Greenhalgh (james.greenha...@arm.com); gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrill Tkachov (kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com); ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com;
seg...@kernel.crashing.org; Marcus Shawcroft (marcus.shawcr...@arm.com)
Subject: [Patch] [AArch64] PR target 66049: fix add/extend gcc test suite
failures
Hi Maintainers,
Please find the attached patch, that fixes add/extend gcc test suite failures
in Aarch64 target.
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049
These tests started to fail after we prevented combiner from converting shift
RTX to mult RTX, when the RTX is not inside a memory operation (r222874) .
Now I have added new add/extend patterns which are based on shift operations,
to fix these cases.
Testing status with the patch.
(1) GCC bootstrap on AArch64 successful.
(2) SPEC2006 INT runs did not show any degradation.
(3) gcc regression testing passed.
(-----Snip-----)
# Comparing 3 common sum files
## /bin/sh ./gcc-fsf-trunk/contrib/compare_tests /tmp/gxx-sum1.24998
/tmp/gxx-sum2.24998 Tests that now work, but didn't before:
gcc.target/aarch64/adds1.c scan-assembler adds\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, lsl
3 gcc.target/aarch64/adds1.c scan-assembler adds\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, x[0-9]+,
lsl 3 gcc.target/aarch64/adds3.c scan-assembler-times adds\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+,
x[0-9]+, sxtw 2 gcc.target/aarch64/extend.c scan-assembler add\tw[0-9]+,.*uxth
#?1 gcc.target/aarch64/extend.c scan-assembler add\tx[0-9]+,.*uxtw #?3
gcc.target/aarch64/extend.c scan-assembler sub\tw[0-9]+,.*uxth #?1
gcc.target/aarch64/extend.c scan-assembler sub\tx[0-9]+,.*uxth #?1
gcc.target/aarch64/extend.c scan-assembler sub\tx[0-9]+,.*uxtw #?3
gcc.target/aarch64/subs1.c scan-assembler subs\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, lsl
3 gcc.target/aarch64/subs1.c scan-assembler subs\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, x[0-9]+,
lsl 3 gcc.target/aarch64/subs3.c scan-assembler-times subs\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+,
x[0-9]+, sxtw 2
# No differences found in 3 common sum files
(-----Snip-----)
The patterns are fixing the regressing tests, so I have not added any new
tests.
Regarding removal of the old patterns based on "mults", I am planning to do
it as a separate work.
Is this OK for trunk ?
gcc/ChangeLog
2015-05-19 Venkataramanan Kumar <venkataramanan.ku...@amd.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md
(*adds_shift_imm_<mode>): New pattern.
(*subs_shift_imm_<mode>): Likewise.
(*adds_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
(*subs_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
(*add_uxt<mode>_shift2): Likewise.
(*add_uxtsi_shift2_uxtw): Likewise.
(*sub_uxt<mode>_shift2): Likewise.
(*sub_uxtsi_shift2_uxtw): Likewise.
Regards,
Venkat.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
index 1dbadc0..d0d6a6a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
@@ -1539,6 +1539,38 @@
[(set_attr "type" "alus_sreg,alus_imm,alus_imm")]
)
+(define_insn "*adds_shift_imm_<mode>"
+ [(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
+ (compare:CC_NZ
+ (plus:GPI (ASHIFT:GPI
+ (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand:QI 2 "aarch64_shift_imm_<mode>" "n"))
+ (match_operand:GPI 3 "register_operand" "r"))
+ (const_int 0)))
+ (set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (plus:GPI (ASHIFT:GPI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2))
+ (match_dup 3)))]
+ ""
+ "adds\\t%<w>0, %<w>3, %<w>1, <shift> %2"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alus_shift_imm")]
+)
+
+(define_insn "*subs_shift_imm_<mode>"
+ [(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
+ (compare:CC_NZ
+ (minus:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (ASHIFT:GPI
+ (match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand:QI 3 "aarch64_shift_imm_<mode>" "n")))
+ (const_int 0)))
+ (set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (minus:GPI (match_dup 1)
+ (ASHIFT:GPI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 3))))]
+ ""
+ "subs\\t%<w>0, %<w>1, %<w>2, <shift> %3"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alus_shift_imm")]
+)
+
(define_insn "*adds_mul_imm_<mode>"
[(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
(compare:CC_NZ
@@ -1599,6 +1631,42 @@
[(set_attr "type" "alus_ext")]
)
+(define_insn "*adds_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>"
+ [(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
+ (compare:CC_NZ
+ (plus:GPI (ashift:GPI
+ (ANY_EXTEND:GPI
+ (match_operand:ALLX 1 "register_operand" "r"))
+ (match_operand 2 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3"))
+ (match_operand:GPI 3 "register_operand" "r"))
+ (const_int 0)))
+ (set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (plus:GPI (ashift:GPI (ANY_EXTEND:GPI (match_dup 1))
+ (match_dup 2))
+ (match_dup 3)))]
+ ""
+ "adds\\t%<GPI:w>0, %<GPI:w>3, %<GPI:w>1, <su>xt<ALLX:size> %2"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alus_ext")]
+)
+
+(define_insn "*subs_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>"
+ [(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
+ (compare:CC_NZ
+ (minus:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (ashift:GPI
+ (ANY_EXTEND:GPI
+ (match_operand:ALLX 2 "register_operand" "r"))
+ (match_operand 3 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3")))
+ (const_int 0)))
+ (set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (minus:GPI (match_dup 1)
+ (ashift:GPI (ANY_EXTEND:GPI (match_dup 2))
+ (match_dup 3))))]
+ ""
+ "subs\\t%<GPI:w>0, %<GPI:w>1, %<GPI:w>2, <su>xt<ALLX:size> %3"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alus_ext")]
+)
+
(define_insn "*adds_<optab><mode>_multp2"
[(set (reg:CC_NZ CC_REGNUM)
(compare:CC_NZ
@@ -1894,6 +1962,38 @@
[(set_attr "type" "adc_reg")]
)
+(define_insn "*add_uxt<mode>_shift2"
+ [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (plus:GPI (and:GPI
+ (ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand 2 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3"))
+ (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
+ (match_operand:GPI 4 "register_operand" "r")))]
+ "aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]), INTVAL (operands[3])) != 0"
+ "*
+ operands[3] = GEN_INT (aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL(operands[2]),
+ INTVAL (operands[3])));
+ return \"add\t%<w>0, %<w>4, %<w>1, uxt%e3 %2\";"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alu_ext")]
+)
+
+;; zero_extend version of above
+(define_insn "*add_uxtsi_shift2_uxtw"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (zero_extend:DI
+ (plus:SI (and:SI
+ (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand 2 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3"))
+ (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
+ (match_operand:SI 4 "register_operand" "r"))))]
+ "aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]), INTVAL (operands[3])) != 0"
+ "*
+ operands[3] = GEN_INT (aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]),
+ INTVAL (operands[3])));
+ return \"add\t%w0, %w4, %w1, uxt%e3 %2\";"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alu_ext")]
+)
+
(define_insn "*add_uxt<mode>_multp2"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
(plus:GPI (and:GPI
@@ -2150,6 +2250,38 @@
[(set_attr "type" "adc_reg")]
)
+(define_insn "*sub_uxt<mode>_shift2"
+ [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (minus:GPI (match_operand:GPI 4 "register_operand" "rk")
+ (and:GPI
+ (ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand 2 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3"))
+ (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))))]
+ "aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]),INTVAL (operands[3])) != 0"
+ "*
+ operands[3] = GEN_INT (aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]),
+ INTVAL (operands[3])));
+ return \"sub\t%<w>0, %<w>4, %<w>1, uxt%e3 %2\";"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alu_ext")]
+)
+
+;; zero_extend version of above
+(define_insn "*sub_uxtsi_shift2_uxtw"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
+ (zero_extend:DI
+ (minus:SI (match_operand:SI 4 "register_operand" "rk")
+ (and:SI
+ (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (match_operand 2 "aarch64_imm3" "Ui3"))
+ (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n")))))]
+ "aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]),INTVAL (operands[3])) != 0"
+ "*
+ operands[3] = GEN_INT (aarch64_uxt_size (INTVAL (operands[2]),
+ INTVAL (operands[3])));
+ return \"sub\t%w0, %w4, %w1, uxt%e3 %2\";"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alu_ext")]
+)
+
(define_insn "*sub_uxt<mode>_multp2"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=rk")
(minus:GPI (match_operand:GPI 4 "register_operand" "rk")
