On 27 May 2015 14:20, John David Anglin wrote: > On 2015-05-27 1:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > since i'm not looped into gcc development normally, which branches are those > > currently ? naively reading gcc.gnu.org homepage makes me think none since > > they're labled "regression fixes" and afaict, none of these are regressions. > > they've been broken for as long as the ports have existed :/. > > The branches are 4.8, 4.9, 5 and trunk as noted on http://gcc.gnu.org. > For target fixes, that don't > affect primary or secondary targets, nobody cares about the regression > criteria.
gotcha. i've committed them then to trunk/4.8/4.9/5. hopefully didn't break anything ;). > This is probably one of the causes of poor thread behavior of many > applications running on > parisc hardware. I want to see the patch in Debian and you probably > want it for Gentoo. i've already merged the patches in Gentoo for 4.6+ ;) -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
