On 05/27/2015 07:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/27/2015 07:56 AM, mliska wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:

2015-04-30  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

    * ira-color.c (init_update_cost_records):Use new type-based pool allocator.
    (get_update_cost_record) Likewise.
    (free_update_cost_record_list) Likewise.
    (finish_update_cost_records) Likewise.
    (initiate_cost_update) Likewise.
OK.
jeff


v2
>From b2142d4d3939a81405f562a0970f7223069f130f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mliska <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:56:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/32] Change use to type-based pool allocator in ira-color.c.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2015-04-30  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

	* ira-color.c (init_update_cost_records):Use new type-based pool allocator.
	(get_update_cost_record) Likewise.
	(free_update_cost_record_list) Likewise.
	(finish_update_cost_records) Likewise.
	(initiate_cost_update) Likewise.
---
 gcc/ira-color.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.c b/gcc/ira-color.c
index 4750714..543440d 100644
--- a/gcc/ira-color.c
+++ b/gcc/ira-color.c
@@ -123,6 +123,21 @@ struct update_cost_record
   int divisor;
   /* Next record for given allocno.  */
   struct update_cost_record *next;
+
+  /* Pool allocation new operator.  */
+  inline void *operator new (size_t)
+  {
+    return pool.allocate ();
+  }
+
+  /* Delete operator utilizing pool allocation.  */
+  inline void operator delete (void *ptr)
+  {
+    pool.remove ((update_cost_record *) ptr);
+  }
+
+  /* Memory allocation pool.  */
+  static pool_allocator<update_cost_record> pool;
 };
 
 /* To decrease footprint of ira_allocno structure we store all data
@@ -1166,16 +1181,8 @@ setup_profitable_hard_regs (void)
    allocnos.  */
 
 /* Pool for update cost records.  */
-static alloc_pool update_cost_record_pool;
-
-/* Initiate update cost records.  */
-static void
-init_update_cost_records (void)
-{
-  update_cost_record_pool
-    = create_alloc_pool ("update cost records",
-			 sizeof (struct update_cost_record), 100);
-}
+static pool_allocator<update_cost_record> update_cost_record_pool
+  ("update cost records", 100);
 
 /* Return new update cost record with given params.  */
 static struct update_cost_record *
@@ -1184,7 +1191,7 @@ get_update_cost_record (int hard_regno, int divisor,
 {
   struct update_cost_record *record;
 
-  record = (struct update_cost_record *) pool_alloc (update_cost_record_pool);
+  record = update_cost_record_pool.allocate ();
   record->hard_regno = hard_regno;
   record->divisor = divisor;
   record->next = next;
@@ -1200,7 +1207,7 @@ free_update_cost_record_list (struct update_cost_record *list)
   while (list != NULL)
     {
       next = list->next;
-      pool_free (update_cost_record_pool, list);
+      update_cost_record_pool.remove (list);
       list = next;
     }
 }
@@ -1209,7 +1216,7 @@ free_update_cost_record_list (struct update_cost_record *list)
 static void
 finish_update_cost_records (void)
 {
-  free_alloc_pool (update_cost_record_pool);
+  update_cost_record_pool.release ();
 }
 
 /* Array whose element value is TRUE if the corresponding hard
@@ -1264,7 +1271,6 @@ initiate_cost_update (void)
     = (struct update_cost_queue_elem *) ira_allocate (size);
   memset (update_cost_queue_elems, 0, size);
   update_cost_check = 0;
-  init_update_cost_records ();
 }
 
 /* Deallocate data used by function update_costs_from_copies.  */
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to