On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Joseph, does the attached testcase make sense for you? Is it defined? It
> > > is my
> > > first attempt to really interpret C standard to detail.
> >
> > I suppose it's defined if unsigned int is the type chosen as compatible
> > with that enum. The test should be skipped for short_enums targets
> > (arm-eabi bare metal) (you can't simply use -fno-short-enums as then that
> > will fail the link-time compatibility checking).
>
> thanks. I did not notice we have -fshort-enum by default targets. I suppose
> we want:
> /* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm-eabi-* } { "*" } { "" } } */
Well, not that (which matches "eabi" against the vendor part of the
triplet), but skip for the short_enums effective-target keyword.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
