On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, James Lemke <jwle...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > >>> Tested on gcc-trunk for arm-none-linux-gnueabi. >>> >>> OK to commit? >>>> >>>> >>> 2015-06-16 James Lemke <jwle...@codesourcery.com> >>> >>> libgcc/config/arm/ >>> * lib1funcs.S (aeabi_idiv0, aeabi_ldiv0): Add CFI entries for >>> Linux ARM_EABI. >> >> >> s/for Linux ARM EABI// >> >> given you handle both __ARM_EABI__ and the not __ARM_EABI__ targets in >> the source. >> >> This is OK if no regressions. > > > I saw no regressions for arm-none-linux-gnueabi. > However, I don't have access to a non-eabi linux target. > Shall I commit with the non-eabi portions or remove them? > Jim.
I have no access to a non-EABI arm target to test this, not sure if there are any intree anymore (probably vxworks ?) . It looks sane on a read - just apply it and look after regressions if anything gets reported in bugzilla. regards Ramana > > > -- > Jim Lemke, GNU Tools Sourcerer > Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery > Orillia, Ontario
