> > testsuite/
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-2.c: Change NOMIPS16 to
> > NOCOMPRESSION.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-3.c: Ditto
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-4.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-5.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-6.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-7.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-8.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-9.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-10.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-11.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-12.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-13.c: Ditto.
> 
> These are OK, except for the splitting of the scan-assembler statements.
> 
> Please change occurrences of:
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> > +"\tld\t\\\$1,%got_page\\(\[^)\]*\\)\\(\\\$3\\)\\n" } } */
> to:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> "\tld\t\\\$1,%got_page\\(\[^)\]*\\)\\(\\\$3\\)\\n" } } */
> 
> before committing.

I think this might be a problem with your email client, as these issues do 
not occur in my patch submission.

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00529.html


> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-14.c: Ditto.
> >     * gcc.target/mips/branch-15.c: Ditto.
> 
> The modifications for these two files need to be removed.   These are
> execution tests and the multilib that is used to link them is important.   If
> the libraries are not compatible with the NOCOMPRESSION attribute, then the
> link step will fail.  You could work around this problem by enabling
> interlinking, but I think the best approach is to leave these two tests alone.

Firstly, I have committed a patch which does not include the branch-[14,15].c 
and
umips-branch-[17,18].c changes (SVN 225540).  However, I am keen to get these 
changes committed purely so that we have an in-range micromips branch execution 
test (which none of the current tests provide).  I need to look at the mips.exp 
file 
in more detail, but I was wondering if you would be happy to keep these tests 
in, 
but downgrade them to assemble tests if the required multilib support does not 
exist?


Regards,



Andrew

Reply via email to