> Attachment is the patch which repair -fno-plt support for AArch64.
>
> aarch64_is_noplt_call_p will only be true if:
>
> * gcc is generating position independent code.
> * function symbol has declaration.
> * either -fno-plt or "(no_plt)" attribute specified.
> * it's a external function.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> 2015-07-16 Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@arm.com>
>
> gcc/
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New
> declaration.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New function.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (call_value_symbol): Check noplt
> scenarios.
> (call_symbol): Ditto.
Shouldn't the same treatment be applied to tailcall (sibcall_{,value_}symbol)
patterns? I guess it could be done as a followup patch, but would be nice if
that isn't forgotten.
Alexander
