Le 17/07/2015 20:40, Steve Kargl a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:50:26PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: >> Le 17/07/2015 11:02, Mikael Morin a écrit : >>> Le 16/07/2015 16:34, Damian Rouson a écrit : >>>> Alternatively, if it?s easy, please feel free to add the directives and >>>> commit. >>>> >> >>> Never mind, I'll take care of it all. >>> >> This is what I have committed: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/r225930 (trunk) >> https://gcc.gnu.org/r225932 (5 branch) >> > > Hi Mikael, > > It seems that this commit has changed the scanning of > other testcases. > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_16.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times > original "_gfortran_caf_co_reduce \\(&desc.., &fr, 4, > _gfortran_caf_num_images \\(0, -1\\), &stat1, errmesg1, 0, 6\\);" 1 > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_16.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times > original "_gfortran_caf_co_reduce \\(&val2, &gz, 0, 4, &stat2, errmesg2, 0, > 7\\);" 1 > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_16.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times > original "_gfortran_caf_co_reduce \\(&desc.., &hc, 1, res, &stat3, errmesg3, > 99, 8\\);" > Hmm,
now you bring the topic, I realize I haven't tested the patch against the testsuite (except the new file). Will fix. Mikael
