On 16/07/15 12:15, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote:
On 16/07/15 10:44, Richard Biener wrote:

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com>
wrote:

Hi,

I.

In openmp expansion of loops, we do some effort to try to create matching
loops in the loop state of the child function, f.i.in
expand_omp_for_generic:
...
        struct loop *outer_loop;
        if (seq_loop)
          outer_loop = l0_bb->loop_father;
        else
          {
            outer_loop = alloc_loop ();
            outer_loop->header = l0_bb;
            outer_loop->latch = l2_bb;
            add_loop (outer_loop, l0_bb->loop_father);
          }

        if (!gimple_omp_for_combined_p (fd->for_stmt))
          {
            struct loop *loop = alloc_loop ();
            loop->header = l1_bb;
            /* The loop may have multiple latches.  */
            add_loop (loop, outer_loop);
          }
...

And if that doesn't work out, we try to mark the loop state for fixup, in
expand_omp_taskreg and expand_omp_target:
...
        /* When the OMP expansion process cannot guarantee an up-to-date
           loop tree arrange for the child function to fixup loops.  */
        if (loops_state_satisfies_p (LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP))
          child_cfun->x_current_loops->state |= LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP;
...

and expand_omp_for:
...
    else
      /* If there isn't a continue then this is a degerate case where
         the introduction of abnormal edges during lowering will prevent
         original loops from being detected.  Fix that up.  */
      loops_state_set (LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP);
...

However, loops are fixed up anyway, because the first pass we execute
with
the new child function is pass_fixup_cfg.

The new child function contains a function call to
__builtin_omp_get_num_threads, which is marked with ECF_CONST, so
execute_fixup_cfg marks the function for TODO_cleanup_cfg, and
subsequently
the loops with LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP.


II.

This patch adds a verification that at the end of the omp-expand
processing
of the child function, either the loop structure is ok, or marked for
fixup.

This verfication triggered a failure in parloops. When an outer loop is
being parallelized, both the outer and inner loop are cancelled. Then
during
omp-expansion, we create a loop in the loop state for the outer loop (the
one that is transformed), but not for the inner, which causes the
verification failure:
...
outer-1.c:11:3: error: loop with header 5 not in loop tree
...

[ I ran into this verification failure with an openacc kernels testcase
on
the gomp-4_0-branch, where parloops is called additionally from a
different
location, and pass_fixup_cfg is not the first pass that the child
function
is processed by. ]

The patch contains a bit that makes sure that the loop state of the child
function is marked for fixup in parloops. The bit is non-trival since it
create a loop state and sets the fixup flag on the loop state, but
postpones
the init_loops_structure call till move_sese_region_to_fn, where it can
succeed.



<SNIP>

Can we fix the root-cause of the issue instead?  That is, build a valid loop
structure in the first place?


This patch manages to keep the loop structure, that is, to not cancel the loop tree in parloops, and guarantee a valid loop structure at the end of parloops.

The transformation to insert the omp_for invalidates the loop state properties LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS and LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES, so we drop those in parloops.

In expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, we detect the existing loop struct of the omp_for, and keep it.

Then by calling pass_tree_loop_init after pass_expand_omp_ssa, we get the loop state properties LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS and LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES back.

Tested by running:
- gcc dg.exp "parloops*.c"
- gcc autopar.exp
- target-libgomp c.exp

Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing on x86_64.

If that succeeds, OK for trunk?

Thanks,
- Tom


Don't cancel loop tree in parloops

2015-07-20  Tom de Vries  <t...@codesourcery.com>

	PR tree-optimization/66846
	* omp-low.c (expand_omp_taskreg) [ENABLE_CHECKING]: Call
	verify_loop_structure for child_cfun if !LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP.
	(expand_omp_target) [ENABLE_CHECKING]: Same.
	(execute_expand_omp)  [ENABLE_CHECKING]: Call verify_loop_structure for
	cfun if !LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP.
	(expand_omp_for_static_nochunk): Handle case that omp_for already has
	its own loop struct.
	* passes.def: Add pass_tree_loop_init after pass_expand_omp_ssa in
	pass_parallelize_loops.
	* tree-parloops.c (create_parallel_loop): Add comment.
	(gen_parallel_loop): Remove call to cancel_loop_tree.
	(parallelize_loops): Skip loops that are inner loops of parallelized
	loops.
	(pass_parallelize_loops::execute): Clear LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS and
	LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES on loop state.
	[ENABLE_CHECKING]: Call verify_loop_structure.
	* tree-ssa-loop.c (pass_tree_loop_init::clone): New function.
---
 gcc/omp-low.c       | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 gcc/passes.def      |  1 +
 gcc/tree-parloops.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c |  1 +
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp-low.c
index 3135606..dce0c02 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-low.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -5604,6 +5604,10 @@ expand_omp_taskreg (struct omp_region *region)
 	}
       if (gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun))
 	update_ssa (TODO_update_ssa);
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+      if (!loops_state_satisfies_p (LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP))
+	verify_loop_structure ();
+#endif
       pop_cfun ();
     }
 
@@ -6843,9 +6847,17 @@ expand_omp_for_static_nochunk (struct omp_region *region,
   set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, fin_bb,
 			   recompute_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, fin_bb));
 
+  struct loop *loop = body_bb->loop_father;
+  if (loop != entry_bb->loop_father)
+    {
+      gcc_assert (loop->header == body_bb);
+      gcc_assert (broken_loop || loop->latch == region->cont);
+      return;
+    }
+
   if (!broken_loop && !gimple_omp_for_combined_p (fd->for_stmt))
     {
-      struct loop *loop = alloc_loop ();
+      loop = alloc_loop ();
       loop->header = body_bb;
       if (collapse_bb == NULL)
 	loop->latch = cont_bb;
@@ -8984,6 +8996,10 @@ expand_omp_target (struct omp_region *region)
 	  if (changed)
 	    cleanup_tree_cfg ();
 	}
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+      if (!loops_state_satisfies_p (LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP))
+	verify_loop_structure ();
+#endif
       pop_cfun ();
     }
 
@@ -9492,6 +9508,10 @@ execute_expand_omp (void)
 
   expand_omp (root_omp_region);
 
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+  if (!loops_state_satisfies_p (LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP))
+    verify_loop_structure ();
+#endif
   cleanup_tree_cfg ();
 
   free_omp_regions ();
diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
index 6b66f8f..ea3a800 100644
--- a/gcc/passes.def
+++ b/gcc/passes.def
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 	  NEXT_PASS (pass_parallelize_loops);
 	  PUSH_INSERT_PASSES_WITHIN (pass_parallelize_loops)
 	      NEXT_PASS (pass_expand_omp_ssa);
+	      NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_init);
 	  POP_INSERT_PASSES ()
 	  NEXT_PASS (pass_ch_vect);
 	  NEXT_PASS (pass_if_conversion);
diff --git a/gcc/tree-parloops.c b/gcc/tree-parloops.c
index ec41834..e33071d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-parloops.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-parloops.c
@@ -2045,7 +2045,14 @@ create_parallel_loop (struct loop *loop, tree loop_fn, tree data,
 
   guard = make_edge (for_bb, ex_bb, 0);
   single_succ_edge (loop->latch)->flags = 0;
+
+  /* After creating this edge, the latch has two successors, so
+     LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES is no longer valid.  Furthermore, this exit is
+     not recorded.  We'll update the loop state as such at the end of the
+     pass, since it's not needed earlier, and doing it earlier will invalidate
+     info for loops we still need to process.  */
   end = make_edge (loop->latch, ex_bb, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
+
   for (gphi_iterator gpi = gsi_start_phis (ex_bb);
        !gsi_end_p (gpi); gsi_next (&gpi))
     {
@@ -2282,10 +2289,6 @@ gen_parallel_loop (struct loop *loop,
 
   scev_reset ();
 
-  /* Cancel the loop (it is simpler to do it here rather than to teach the
-     expander to do it).  */
-  cancel_loop_tree (loop);
-
   /* Free loop bound estimations that could contain references to
      removed statements.  */
   FOR_EACH_LOOP (loop, 0)
@@ -2521,6 +2524,7 @@ parallelize_loops (void)
   unsigned n_threads = flag_tree_parallelize_loops;
   bool changed = false;
   struct loop *loop;
+  struct loop *skip_loop = NULL;
   struct tree_niter_desc niter_desc;
   struct obstack parloop_obstack;
   HOST_WIDE_INT estimated;
@@ -2538,6 +2542,19 @@ parallelize_loops (void)
 
   FOR_EACH_LOOP (loop, 0)
     {
+      if (loop == skip_loop)
+	{
+	  if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+	    fprintf (dump_file,
+		     "Skipping loop %d as inner loop of parallelized loop\n",
+		     loop->num);
+
+	  skip_loop = loop->inner;
+	  continue;
+	}
+      else
+	skip_loop = NULL;
+
       reduction_list.empty ();
       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
       {
@@ -2597,6 +2614,7 @@ parallelize_loops (void)
 	continue;
 
       changed = true;
+      skip_loop = loop->inner;
       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
       {
 	if (loop->inner)
@@ -2663,6 +2681,13 @@ pass_parallelize_loops::execute (function *fun)
   if (parallelize_loops ())
     {
       fun->curr_properties &= ~(PROP_gimple_eomp);
+
+      release_recorded_exits ();
+      loops_state_clear (LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES);
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+      verify_loop_structure ();
+#endif
+
       return TODO_update_ssa;
     }
 
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c
index 078b1d1..3520d92 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ public:
 
   /* opt_pass methods: */
   virtual unsigned int execute (function *);
+  opt_pass * clone () { return new pass_tree_loop_init (m_ctxt); }
 
 }; // class pass_tree_loop_init
 
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to