Hi,

This patch prevents testcase pr63210.c from running with -march=armv4t.
Object size check should be skipped with explicit -march=armv4t, because
expected size is only correct using pop pc instruction which is unsafe for
armv4t. For arm_arch_v5t_ok cases, an explicit -march=armv5t flag is set.

Is patch ok for trunk and fsf-5?

gcc/testsuite

2015-07-23  Alex Velenko  <alex.vele...@arm.com>

        * gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c (dg-skip-if): Skip armv4t.
        (dg-additional-options): Add -march=armv5t if arm_arch_v5t_ok.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c
index c3ae928..9b63a67 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr63210.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 /* { dg-do assemble } */
 /* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os " }  */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not test on armv4t" { *-*-* } { "-march=armv4t" } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv5t" {target arm_arch_v5t_ok} } */
 
 int foo1 (int c);
 int foo2 (int c);
-- 
1.8.1.2

Reply via email to