On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 08:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> >> The attached patch does just that; it teaches
> >> replace_block_vars_by_duplicates to replace the decls inside the
> >> value-exprs with a duplicate too. It's kind of messy though. At the
> >> moment I'm only considering VAR_DECL, PARM_DECL, RESULT_DECL, ADDR_EXPR,
> >> ARRAY_REF, COMPONENT_REF, CONVERT_EXPR, NOP_EXPR, INDIRECT_REF and
> >> MEM_REFs. I suspect that I may be missing some, but these are the only
> >> ones that were triggered gcc_unreachable during testing.
> > 
> > Ugh, that looks ugly, why do we have all the tree walkers?
> > I'd unshare_expr the value expr first, you really don't want to share
> > it anyway, and then just walk_tree and find all the decls in there
> > (with *walk_subtrees on types and perhaps something else too) and for them
> > replace_by_duplicate_decl (tp, vars_map, to_context);
> 
> Something like the attached patch? Why do TREE_TYPEs need special handling?

They can have decls in various places like TYPE_SIZE_UNIT, TYPE_SIZE, the
bounds of TYPE_DOMAIN etc. and I believe you generally don't want to replace
those.  Plus you risk infinite recursion then (unless 
walk_tree_without_duplicates).
Most walk_tree callbacks just do something like
  if (IS_TYPE_OR_DECL_P (*tp))
    *walk_subtrees = 0;

        Jakub

Reply via email to