On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool >>>> <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>>>>> Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking >>>>>> this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end): >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately it causes about a thousand test fails on powerpc64-linux >>>>> (at least, it seems to be this patch, I haven't actually checked). >>>>> >>>> >>>> It also caused: >>>> >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978 >>>> >>> >>> and maybe: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983 >> >> I request that this patch be reverted (again). > > And I request to test any new patches under x32 before checking in. > You can use Ubuntu 14 to test x32.
x32 is neither primary nor secondary arch. Richard. > Thanks. > > -- > H.J.
