On 7/6/15, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/05/2015 04:58 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: >> I was just matching the code that was already used there... should the >> lines to ignore the CVS and .svn folders be re-written into the style >> you propose, too? > Might as well have a consistent style. Embedding them into the "find" > ought to be marginally faster than a pipeline of fgrep processes. > > jeff >
Okay, I tried embedding "! -name CVS/ ! -name .svn/" into the find command, too, but that just led to warnings such as: find: warning: Unix filenames usually don't contain slashes (though pathnames do). That means that '-name `CVS/'' will probably evaluate to false all the time on this system. You might find the '-wholename' test more useful, or perhaps '-samefile'. Alternatively, if you are using GNU grep, you could use 'find ... -print0 | grep -FzZ `CVS/''. find: warning: Unix filenames usually don't contain slashes (though pathnames do). That means that '-name `.svn/'' will probably evaluate to false all the time on this system. You might find the '-wholename' test more useful, or perhaps '-samefile'. Alternatively, if you are using GNU grep, you could use 'find ... -print0 | grep -FzZ `.svn/''. I'm not really sure which of these alternatives to go with... cc-ing the fixincludes maintainer to see which he wants to go with...
