On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Michael Meissner wrote: > #6 Add support for using different names for the 64/128-bit integer > conversion to IBM extended double, to allow a future version to > switch the default for what long double is. It is not expected that GCC > 6.x will make this switch, but we would like to eventually use the > standard TF names for the library when the default change is made. If > this isn't clear, the following names use 'tf' in them, when they use > IBM extended double:
That would be for a completely separate ABI, incompatible with all existing objects both static and shared, since the existing ABI defines these names to have their existing meanings? -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
