On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 20, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > where the references always use positive offset and are based on the > > next previous lable (so Ldebug_info_from_t1.c is not refering to > > an entity at Ldebug_info_from_t2.c or beyond). So that seems to > > follow the restrictions you laid out above. > > I agree. > > > If basic testing doesn't help I'll refrain from doing it ;) It > > can only break LTO in the end. > > :-) Actually, I don’t mind. It should be easy enough to ask a darwin > person to spin it and watch for breakage if you want. I don’t expect it > to not work given your elaboration.
Err - you _are_ a darwin persion ;) According to MAINTAINERS at least... Richard.
