> Otherwise looks good, but strncat is C99, and we support targets which > don't have a C99 libc (been there, done that..). Since in this case > you're dealing with string literals rather than user input, it ought > to be safe to just use plain strcat (or strlen+memcpy, if you prefer).
Nope, strncat() is C90: http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/strncat Thus, safe to use, I think. I committed as submitted, as revision 227105. Thanks for the review. FX
