2015-09-01 17:31 GMT+02:00 Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>:
> On 09/01/2015 11:27 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>
>> I rewrote binary/unary overflow-check logic so, that we avoid double
>> checking-s.  I think this address things as you intend, beside the
>> checking for constant value.  We would need to check for *_CST
>> tree-codes.  Is there a macro we could use, which is just checking for
>> those?
>
>
> Yes, CONSTANT_CLASS_P.
>
> Jason


Thanks, I found it too :]  I applied a patch short-cutting check for
cases that operands aren't of constant-class.

Kai

Reply via email to