Hi, On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Interesting. Is this mode ABI-compatible with the default mode? > > Yes, that's the main reason I want to make this change. > > > Should _FORTIFY_SOURCE imply _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS? > > Yes, I think it should. Then at least those assertions that lie in a different big-O complexity class have to be moved away from _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS (as hinted in your initial mail). Some distros build packages with _FORTIFY_SOURCE, and while additional asserts seem acceptable, going from constant to linear (or the like) seems not. Ciao, Michael.
