Hi,
On 08/24/2015 02:55 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
today I spent more time on this issue (which is getting duplicates).
In fact it boils down to two separate issues:
1- Give a name to the warning, to make possible disabling it.
2- Don't talk about "anonymous namespace" when no anonymous namespace
is involved.
Issue 1- should be rather straightforward, besides maybe the name
itself: the below has Wsubobject-linkage. Makes sense?
Issue 2- seems slightly less trivial: the below first uses
no_linkage_check and then falls back to the usual "anonymous
namespace" message.
Pinging this...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01411.html
Thanks,
Paolo.
