On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 07:23:53PM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > Frankly, I would accept the patch with the proviso that: > (i) It is hidden behand a gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_GNU, ".......; > (ii) The feature is set in conflict with the new features that FX > mentions, especially coarrays and bind C; and
Did we also need to add Cray pointers to the list of possible conflicts? I can't remember the details of the implementation, but I do recall that Asher added a number of conflicts for F95+ attributes. -- Steve
