On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:01:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/25/2015 10:58 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > >Woops, we crossed wires. I just committed this patch. Would you like > >me to revert it? > Leave it. If Andi can include a reversion if he can pound his work > around 66890 into submission.
The patch is stable, was just gathering more data. > But I think it'd need some of the > varasm.c work Jan hinted at. The varasm work should be only needed if no function splitting is done, right? With my patch most functions do function splitting. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
