Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add mkoffload for Intel MIC

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 09/29/2015 12:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
I agree that obstacks are better here.  Efficiency shouldn't matter here.
But we're in C++ now so can't we statically construct the array with
sth like
const char *new_argv[] = { "objcopy", ... };

?  Thus have the compiler figure out the number of args.  That would work
for me as well.

The issue is that the code is about to be changed to conditionally pass 
certain arguments ("-v"), so you no longer have a fixed arglist.


Bernd