On 10/06/2015 04:50 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:59 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation.
I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die.
I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all languages accept
ada,lto,fortran, ok?
Could you please also build a few large source files and compare
before/after code generation to ensure there are no changes? I always
try to do this for patches like this one to avoid accidents, and this
change looks sufficiently non-mechanical to warrant it. Could also test
mips-elf.
I've ran a CSiBE comparison for "-O2 -m4-single -ml" on sh-elf. There
are no code changes with Trev's patch.
Thanks! Good enough.
Bernd
