> > Yeah, I suppose we'd need to either build a new function type for each > variadic call > then or somehow represent 'fntype' differently (note that function > attributes also > need to be preserved).
Why we can't keep fntype as it is, but simply add a new set of parameters to call stmt that lists their types? We can then feed those types to expand_call (since we still go back to generic here I suppose we will just re-insert those VCEs in expand-cfg.c) Honza
