On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 06:20:06PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Jakub!
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:30:28 +0100, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > gfc_match_oacc_update (void)
> > > {
> > > gfc_omp_clauses *c;
> > > + locus here = gfc_current_locus;
> > > +
> > > if (gfc_match_omp_clauses (&c, OACC_UPDATE_CLAUSES, false, false, true)
> > > != MATCH_YES)
> > > return MATCH_ERROR;
> > >
> > > + if (!c->lists[OMP_LIST_MAP])
> > > + {
> > > + gfc_error ("%<acc update%> must contain at least one "
> > > + "%<device%> or %<host/self%> clause at %L", &here);
> >
> > There is no host/self clause I'd guess, so you should spell those
> > separately.
>
> That's the same language as used in the C and C++ front ends; the host
> and self clauses are synonymous.
Then it should be %<host%>/%<self%> at least, or better
%<host%> or %<self%>.
Both in Fortran and in the C/C++ FEs.
Jakub
