On 11/07/2015 04:30 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com> > wrote: >> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my >> front end changes from trunk. > >> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c >> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c >> @@ -14398,7 +14398,6 @@ tsubst_omp_clauses (tree clauses, bool declare_simd, >> bool allow_fields, >> case OMP_CLAUSE_NUM_GANGS: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_NUM_WORKERS: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_VECTOR_LENGTH: >> - case OMP_CLAUSE_GANG: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_WORKER: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_VECTOR: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_ASYNC: >> @@ -14427,7 +14426,7 @@ tsubst_omp_clauses (tree clauses, bool declare_simd, >> bool allow_fields, >> = tsubst_omp_clause_decl (OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (oc), args, complain, >> in_decl); >> break; >> - case OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR: >> + case OMP_CLAUSE_GANG: >> case OMP_CLAUSE_ALIGNED: >> OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (nc) >> = tsubst_omp_clause_decl (OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (oc), args, complain, > > This -- unintentional, I suppose ;-) -- removal of OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR > caused a lot of regressions; committed to gomp-4_0-branch in r229928:
Thank you. I had two versions of this patch and I committed the wrong one. That was the only change though. Cesar
