On 11/09/2015 02:32 PM, Robert Suchanek wrote:
The results below were generated for CSiBE benchmark and the numbers in columns express bytes in format 'net (gain/loss)' to show the difference with and without the patch when -frename-registers switch is used.
I'm not entirely sure what the numbers represent. I can see how you'd measure at a net size change (I assume a negative net is the intended goal), but how did you arrive at gain/loss numbers?
In any case, assuming negative is good, the results seem pretty decent.
+ gcc_assert + (terminated_this_insn->regno == REGNO (recog_data.operand[1]));
Maybe break the line before the == so that you can start the arguments on the same line as the assert.
+ /* Nonzero if the chain is renamed. */ + unsigned int renamed:1;
I'd write "has already been renamed" since that is maybe slightly less ambiguous.
Ok with those changes. Bernd
