Committed as r230160.

Thanks,
Simon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moore, Catherine [mailto:catherine_mo...@mentor.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2015 14:00
> To: Simon Dardis; Matthew Fortune
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH, Mips] Compact branch/delay slot optimization.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Dardis [mailto:simon.dar...@imgtec.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 10:00 AM
> > To: Moore, Catherine; Matthew Fortune
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH, Mips] Compact branch/delay slot optimization.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to resubmit the previous patch as it failed to check if the
> > branch inside the sequence had a compact form.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Simon
> >
> > gcc/
> >         * config/mips/mips.c: (mips_breakable_sequence_p): New function.
> >           (mips_break_sequence): New function.
> >           (mips_reorg_process_insns) Use them. Use compact branches in
> > selected
> >           situations.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >         * gcc.target/mips/split-ds-sequence.c: Test for the above.
> 
> Hi Simon,
> This patch looks okay with the exception of one stylistic change.
> Please change all instances of :
> +mips_breakable_sequence_p (rtx_insn * insn)
> To:
> +mips_breakable_sequence_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> Okay, with those changes.
> Thanks,
> Catherine
> 
> 
> >
> > Index: config/mips/mips.c
> >
> ==========================================================
> > =========
> > --- config/mips/mips.c      (revision 228282)
> > +++ config/mips/mips.c      (working copy)
> > @@ -16973,6 +16973,34 @@
> >        }
> >  }
> >
> > +/* A SEQUENCE is breakable iff the branch inside it has a compact form
> > +   and the target has compact branches.  */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +mips_breakable_sequence_p (rtx_insn * insn) {
> > +  return (insn && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == SEQUENCE
> > +     && TARGET_CB_MAYBE
> > +     && get_attr_compact_form (SEQ_BEGIN (insn)) !=
> > COMPACT_FORM_NEVER);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Remove a SEQUENCE and replace it with the delay slot instruction
> > +   followed by the branch and return the instruction in the delay slot.
> > +   Return the first of the two new instructions.
> > +   Subroutine of mips_reorg_process_insns.  */
> > +
> > +static rtx_insn *
> > +mips_break_sequence (rtx_insn * insn) {
> > +  rtx_insn * before = PREV_INSN (insn);
> > +  rtx_insn * branch = SEQ_BEGIN (insn);
> > +  rtx_insn * ds = SEQ_END (insn);
> > +  remove_insn (insn);
> > +  add_insn_after (ds, before, NULL);
> > +  add_insn_after (branch, ds, NULL);
> > +  return ds;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Go through the instruction stream and insert nops where necessary.
> >     Also delete any high-part relocations whose partnering low parts
> >     are now all dead.  See if the whole function can then be put into
> > @@ -17065,6 +17093,68 @@
> >     {
> >       if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == SEQUENCE)
> >         {
> > +         rtx_insn * next_active = next_active_insn (insn);
> > +         /* Undo delay slots to avoid bubbles if the next instruction can
> > +            be placed in a forbidden slot or the cost of adding an
> > +            explicit NOP in a forbidden slot is OK and if the SEQUENCE is
> > +            safely breakable.  */
> > +         if (TARGET_CB_MAYBE
> > +             && mips_breakable_sequence_p (insn)
> > +             && INSN_P (SEQ_BEGIN (insn))
> > +             && INSN_P (SEQ_END (insn))
> > +             && ((next_active
> > +                  && INSN_P (next_active)
> > +                  && GET_CODE (PATTERN (next_active)) != SEQUENCE
> > +                  && get_attr_can_delay (next_active) ==
> > CAN_DELAY_YES)
> > +                 || !optimize_size))
> > +           {
> > +             /* To hide a potential pipeline bubble, if we scan backwards
> > +                from the current SEQUENCE and find that there is a load
> > +                of a value that is used in the CTI and there are no
> > +                dependencies between the CTI and instruction in the
> > delay
> > +                slot, break the sequence so the load delay is hidden.  */
> > +             HARD_REG_SET uses;
> > +             CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (uses);
> > +             note_uses (&PATTERN (SEQ_BEGIN (insn)),
> > record_hard_reg_uses,
> > +                        &uses);
> > +             HARD_REG_SET delay_sets;
> > +             CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (delay_sets);
> > +             note_stores (PATTERN (SEQ_END (insn)),
> > record_hard_reg_sets,
> > +                          &delay_sets);
> > +
> > +             rtx prev = prev_active_insn (insn);
> > +             if (prev
> > +                 && GET_CODE (PATTERN (prev)) == SET
> > +                 && MEM_P (SET_SRC (PATTERN (prev))))
> > +               {
> > +                 HARD_REG_SET sets;
> > +                 CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (sets);
> > +                 note_stores (PATTERN (prev), record_hard_reg_sets,
> > +                              &sets);
> > +
> > +                 /* Re-order if safe.  */
> > +                 if (!hard_reg_set_intersect_p (delay_sets, uses)
> > +                     && hard_reg_set_intersect_p (uses, sets))
> > +                   {
> > +                     next_insn = mips_break_sequence (insn);
> > +                     /* Need to process the hazards of the newly
> > +                        introduced instructions.  */
> > +                     continue;
> > +                   }
> > +               }
> > +
> > +             /* If we find an orphaned high-part relocation in a delay
> > +                slot then we can convert to a compact branch and get
> > +                the orphaned high part deleted.  */
> > +             if (mips_orphaned_high_part_p (&htab, SEQ_END (insn)))
> > +               {
> > +                 next_insn = mips_break_sequence (insn);
> > +                 /* Need to process the hazards of the newly
> > +                    introduced instructions.  */
> > +                 continue;
> > +               }
> > +           }
> > +
> >           /* If we find an orphaned high-part relocation in a delay
> >              slot, it's easier to turn that instruction into a NOP than
> >              to delete it.  The delay slot will be a NOP either way.  */ @@
> > -17099,6 +17189,33 @@
> >             {
> >               mips_avoid_hazard (last_insn, insn, &hilo_delay,
> >                                  &delayed_reg, lo_reg, &fs_delay);
> > +             /* When a compact branch introduces a forbidden slot
> > hazard
> > +                and the next useful instruction is a SEQUENCE of a jump
> > +                and a non-nop instruction in the delay slot, remove the
> > +                sequence and replace it with the delay slot instruction
> > +                then the jump to clear the forbidden slot hazard.  */
> > +
> > +             if (fs_delay)
> > +               {
> > +                 /* Search onwards from the current position looking for
> > +                    a SEQUENCE.  We are looking for pipeline hazards
> > here
> > +                    and do not need to worry about labels or barriers as
> > +                    the optimization only undoes delay slot filling which
> > +                    only affects the order of the branch and its delay
> > +                    slot.  */
> > +                 rtx_insn * next = next_active_insn (insn);
> > +                 if (next
> > +                     && USEFUL_INSN_P (next)
> > +                     && GET_CODE (PATTERN (next)) == SEQUENCE
> > +                     && mips_breakable_sequence_p (next))
> > +                   {
> > +                     last_insn = insn;
> > +                     next_insn = mips_break_sequence (next);
> > +                     /* Need to process the hazards of the newly
> > +                        introduced instructions.  */
> > +                     continue;
> > +                   }
> > +               }
> >               last_insn = insn;
> >             }
> >         }
> > Index: testsuite/gcc.target/mips/split-ds-sequence.c
> >
> ==========================================================
> > =========
> > --- testsuite/gcc.target/mips/split-ds-sequence.c   (revision 0)
> > +++ testsuite/gcc.target/mips/split-ds-sequence.c   (working copy)
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +/* { dg-options "isa_rev>=6" } */
> > +/* { dg-skip-if "code quality test" { *-*-* } {
> > +"-mcompact-branches=never" }
> > { "" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "nop" } } */
> > +
> > +int
> > +testg2 (int a, int c)
> > +{
> > +
> > +  int j = 0;
> > +  do
> > +    {
> > +      j += a;
> > +    }
> > +  while (j < 56);
> > +
> > +  j += c;
> > +  return j;
> > +
> > +}
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Dardis
> > Sent: 25 September 2015 15:56
> > To: Moore, Catherine
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: [PATCH, Mips] Compact branch/delay slot optimization.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The following patch adds three small optimizations related to compact
> > branches for MIPSR6:
> >
> > When the result of a load is used by a delay slot branch immediately
> > afterwards, undo the delay slot branch scheduling to hide the pipeline
> > bubble if safe and use a compact branch instead.
> >
> > Undo delay slot scheduling if an orphaned high-part relocation is in a
> > delay slot and use a compact branch is used instead.
> >
> > Undo delay slot scheduling in the case where a forbidden slot hazard
> > is immediately followed by a delay slot branch. This would cause a nop
> > to be inserted otherwise.
> >
> > No regressions. OK to apply?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Simon
> >
> > gcc/
> >         * config/mips/mips.c: (mips_break_sequence): New function.
> >           (mips_reorg_process_insns) Use it. Use compact branches in 
> > selected
> >           situations.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >         * gcc.target/mips/split-ds-sequence.c: Test for the above.

Reply via email to