On 11/11/2015 05:40 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 11/10/15 18:08, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >> On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate >>> patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were >>> passing by accident, and lacked a data clause. >> >> It used to be if a reduction was on a parallel construct, the gimplifier >> would introduce a pcopy clause for the reduction variable if it was not >> associated with any data clause. Is that not the case anymore? > > AFAICT, the std doesn't specify that behaviour. 2.6 'Data Environment' > doesn't mention reductions as a modifier for implicitly determined data > attributes.
I guess I was confused because the reduction section in 2.5.11 mentions something about updating the original reduction variable after the parallel region. Cesar
