On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Can you suggest a wording for "if the GNU C language definition changes > [which, no matter how unlikely, is explicitly not ruled out by the > manual] -fwrapv will be extended to signed shifts, and shifts of > negative numbers would return A*2^B whenever the result fits in the type"?
I don't think we can usefully say how a hypothetical change in one area would or would not affect a particular option. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
