On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> If C/C++ array section reductions have non-zero (positive) bias, it is
> implemented by declaring a smaller private array and subtracting the bias
> from the start of the private array (because valid code may only dereference
> elements from bias onwards).  But, this isn't something that is kosher in
> C/C++ pointer arithmetics and the alias oracle seems to get upset on that.
> So, the following patch fixes that by performing the subtraction on integral
> type instead of p+ -bias.

So this still does use the biased pointer because you do not
re-write accesses (where you could have applied the biasing to
the indexes / offsets), right?  Thus the patch is merely obfuscation
for GCC rather than making it kosher for C/C++ (you still have a
pointer pointing outside of the private array object)?

I still hope to have a look where the alias oracle gets things
wrong (well, if so by accident at least).

Richard.

> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk.
> 
> 2015-11-20  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR middle-end/68221
>       * omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses): If C/C++ array reduction
>       has non-zero bias, subtract it in integer type instead of
>       pointer plus of negated bias.
> 
>       * testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-11.c: Remove xfail.
>       * testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-12.c: Likewise.
>       * testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-11.C: Likewise.
>       * testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-12.C: Likewise.
> 
> --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj  2015-11-20 12:56:17.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/omp-low.c     2015-11-20 13:44:29.080374051 +0100
> @@ -4444,11 +4444,13 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, g
>  
>             if (!integer_zerop (bias))
>               {
> -               bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, sizetype, bias);
> -               bias = fold_build1_loc (clause_loc, NEGATE_EXPR,
> -                                       sizetype, bias);
> -               x = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, POINTER_PLUS_EXPR,
> -                                    TREE_TYPE (x), x, bias);
> +               bias = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node,
> +                                        bias);
> +               yb = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, pointer_sized_int_node,
> +                                      x);
> +               yb = fold_build2_loc (clause_loc, MINUS_EXPR,
> +                                     pointer_sized_int_node, yb, bias);
> +               x = fold_convert_loc (clause_loc, TREE_TYPE (x), yb);
>                 yb = create_tmp_var (ptype, name);
>                 gimplify_assign (yb, x, ilist);
>                 x = yb;
> --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-11.c.jj     2015-11-05 
> 16:03:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-11.c        2015-11-20 
> 13:38:24.448520879 +0100
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  
>  char z[10] = { 0 };
>  
> --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-12.c.jj     2015-11-05 
> 16:03:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/reduction-12.c        2015-11-20 
> 13:38:34.565378078 +0100
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  
>  struct A { int t; };
>  struct B { char t; };
> --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-11.C.jj   2015-11-05 
> 16:03:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-11.C      2015-11-20 
> 13:37:53.921951766 +0100
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
> +// { dg-do run }
>  
>  char z[10] = { 0 };
>  
> --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-12.C.jj   2015-11-05 
> 16:03:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/reduction-12.C      2015-11-20 
> 13:38:03.983809741 +0100
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
> +// { dg-do run }
>  
>  template <typename T>
>  struct A
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to