On 11/23/2015 12:07 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53:40AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
Does the following look like the kind of thing you had in mind? (just
the tree.def part for now). Presumably usable for both lvalues and
rvalues, where the thing it wraps is what's important. It merely exists
to add an EXPR_LOCATION, for a usage of the wrapped thing.
Yes, but please see with Jason, Richard and perhaps others if they are ok
with that too before spending too much time in that direction.
All occurrences of it would have to be folded away during the gimplification
at latest, this shouldn't be something we use in the middle-end.
I'd expect LOCATION_EXPR be defined in c-family/c-common.def, not tree.def.
And I'd think it shouldn't survive genericizing, thus never leak into the ME.
Makes sense.
Jason
